Book Lab: Judging a Book By Its Cover

Last month, my friend and library coworker, Jennifer, posted about the inaugural experiment of Book Lab, our unconventional book club. In that experiment, we blindfolded ourselves, chose a book at random from among the stacks, and then made assumptions about it based upon the cover. We were then required to read the book we’d chosen. The experiment yielded some surprising results: some of us liked books we thought we were going to hate; others were disappointed by books that had initially looked promising. We also discovered that when you post pictures of yourself on the internet wearing a blindfold, you will attract bondage enthusiasts to your blog (!).

Mostly, we concluded that book covers lie. More specifically, book covers aren’t just decoration, they’re a marketing tool. They’re designed with a specific readership in mind, and they’re artfully engineered to appeal to the aesthetic of that readership.

SweetInBetweenThis is clear in the cover of the book I chose, Sherri Reynolds’ The Sweet In-Between. The cover of the book shows a young woman in an oversized green evening gown and sneakers, sitting on a stoop with her feet propped on a large suitcase. The bright colors, the sneakers/gown combo and screen doors in the background all suggest a certain flavor of Southern-fried Chick Lit, in the spirit of The Secret Life of Bees, or The Help.

Nothing against either of those books—I read and loved them both. But they were recommended, and not something I’d have picked up on my own. As I gazed with minor dismay at the cover of Reynolds’ book, I could already hear the voice of the kindly older black woman I was sure was in those pages, giving wise advice to a lost and bedraggled white girl.

To my great surprise, that isn’t what Reynolds’ book is about. Rather, it was a story about a young person grappling with gender and sexual identity in a small southern town where there’s a bit of bigotry. I enjoyed the book more than I expected to, mostly due to Reynolds’ luminous prose and her ability to vivify the inner world of the main character, Kenny. In the end, I thought that the plot and story line could have been restructured to make the story more powerful. I also thought Reynolds played it safe in the exploration of  Kenny’s identity, neatly side-stepping the real-world cruelty to which Kenny would have likely been subjected.

But I digress. The point is, the cover of The Sweet In-Between has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the story. At no point does Kenny wear a dress, there’s no mention of red sneakers, she’s not a dreamy, wistful gazer-from-porches. If the cover were going to accurately depict Kenny, it would have featured a person who looked like a young man.

And therein lies the problem: the demographic for this novel (probably determined by the publisher to be 30-60 year-old female readers of Southern Chick Lit) aren’t going to pick up a book with a boy on the cover, because Southern Chick Lit is female-oriented, and the struggles of young men just aren’t a part of that genre, and don’t jive with the snuggly-at-the-end thing that Southern Chick Lit does. (Reynolds, by the way, fulfills this particular obligation.)

I, on the other hand, would have been more inclined to select a book with an androgynous young person on its cover, if the art suggested something about the exploration of gender identity, because that subject interests me, and promises some emotional complexity, which is what gets me off in a novel.

Our conclusions, which you can read in their entirety here, inspired further curiosity about covers and marketing and aesthetics, and our next Book Lab investigation, which I’ll post here in the coming days, was born. In Part 2 of the Judging a Book By Its Cover experiment, we will select a book from the New Books display at the library, based exclusively on cover art, title, blurbs, award announcements—anything but the plot summary, which we won’t be allowed to read. (Sorry, bondage enthusiasts, no blindfolds this time. We thought about selecting our books while wearing handcuffs, just for you folks. But we couldn’t figure out how we’d get the books off the shelves that way.)


4 thoughts on “Book Lab: Judging a Book By Its Cover

  1. Snuggly-at-the-end, I wonder what that is, something like:

    …so the drama at Five Acre Field was at an end. Betty finally found her, “Man of acceptable means” Josh is still proofreading for The Daily Echo, complaining about such, as the folly of citing cutesy idioms in quotes instead of italics. Me? after eight years fighting to overturn prejudice, I think I may have won a small battle in the struggle to get polygamous relations excepted. As I watch Daisy Maye hanging the laundry, her bare feed dancing on the sweet September grass, I can’t help but think that task might be expedited with some help from Arlene–and Gabby: Sue, Yvette, Tracy…

    1. It wasn’t quite like that. Rather, the author chose a tidy ending that mirrored the beginning, so that the story felt neatly packaged. I’ve nothing against happy endings, but there were so many things about this story that felt unresolved, as though very little progress had been made, no conclusions had been reached. In a very real way, readers were still “in-between” at the end of the book, which was ultimately unsatisfying.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s